We can't say anything concrete about how Patrick Dodson voted on increasing Aboriginal land rights
How Patrick Dodson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander land rights by, for example, increasing their legal recognition and protection
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing Aboriginal land rights” which Patrick Dodson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Patrick Dodson on this policy.
| Division | Patrick Dodson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing Aboriginal land rights” which Patrick Dodson could have attended.
| Division | Patrick Dodson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
30th Nov 2023, 10:08 AM – Senate Water Amendment (Restoring Our Rivers) Bill 2023 - Indigenous peoples |
absent | Yes |
12th Sep 2023, 3:53 PM – Senate Committees - Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee; Reference - For an inquiry into adding a sunset clause on Native Title |
absent | No |
21st Mar 2018, 3:58 PM – Senate Motions - Queensland: Native Title - Adani Indigenous Land Use Agreement |
absent | Yes |
3rd May 2016, 3:57 PM – Senate Motions - Budget - Radioactive Waste |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Patrick Dodson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.