How Zed Seselja voted compared to someone who agrees that university students should be able to choose whether or not to pay student services and amenities fees (also called student union fees)

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for voluntary student union fees” which Zed Seselja could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Zed Seselja on this policy.

Division Zed Seselja Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for voluntary student union fees” which Zed Seselja could have attended.

Division Zed Seselja Supporters vote

17th Oct 2017, 3:52 PM – Senate Motions - Higher Education - Student Services and Amenities Fee

absent Yes

17th Oct 2017, 3:48 PM – Senate Motions - Higher Education - Student Services and Amenities Fee

absent Yes

26th Nov 2015, 12:12 PM – Senate Motions - Student Services and Amenities Fee - Students should have to agree to SSAF

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Zed Seselja was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.