How Nova Peris voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should allow companies to mine coal seam (CSG), tight and shale gas

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which Nova Peris could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nova Peris on this policy.

Division Nova Peris Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which Nova Peris could have attended.

Division Nova Peris Supporters vote

22nd Feb 2016, 4:14 PM – Senate Motions - Coal Seam Gas - Narrabri coal seam gas project

No No

24th Nov 2015, 3:56 PM – Senate Motions - Coal Seam Gas - Landholders' right to say "no"

No No

15th Oct 2015, 12:38 PM – Senate Motions - Coal Seam Gas - Ombudsman and audit

No No

26th Mar 2015, 12:44 PM – Senate Motions — Coal Seam Gas

absent No

19th Mar 2015, 11:28 AM – Senate Motions — Ban donations to political parties from mining and coal seam gas (CSG) companies

No No

5th Mar 2015 – Senate Motions — Coal Seam Gas

No No

3rd Mar 2015 – Senate Motions — Liverpool Plains

No No

9th Jul 2014, 3:51 PM – Senate Motions - Coal Seam Gas - Right to say no

No No

15th May 2014, 12:14 PM – Senate Motions - Coal Seam Gas - Bentley blockade

No No

19th Mar 2014, 4:01 PM – Senate Motions - Coal Seam Gas - Stop further approvals

No No

6th Mar 2014, 11:40 AM – Senate Landholders' Right to Refuse (Gas and Coal) Bill 2013 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea

No No

13th Feb 2014, 12:23 PM – Senate Motions - Coal Seam Gas - Landholders' right to refuse

No No

14th Nov 2013, 11:23 AM – Senate Motions - Agriculture - Coal seam gas wells

No No

How "voted consistently for" is worked out

They Vote For You gives each vote a score based on whether the MP voted in agreement with the policy or not. These scores are then averaged with a weighting across all votes that the MP could have voted on relevant to the policy. The overall average score is then converted to a simple english language phrase based on the range of values it's within.

When an MP votes in agreement with a policy the vote is scored as 100%. When they vote against the policy it is scored as 0% and when they are absent it is scored half way between the two at 50%. The half way point effectively says "we don't know whether they are for or against this policy".

The overall agreement score for the policy is worked out by a weighted average of the scores for each vote. The weighting has been chosen so that the most important votes have a weighting 5 times that of the less important votes. Also, absent votes on less important votes are weighted 5 times less again to not penalise MPs for not attending the less important votes. Pressure of other work means MPs or Senators are not always available to vote – it does not always mean they've abstained.

Type of vote Agreement score (s) Weight (w) No of votes (n)
Most important votes MP voted with policy 100% 25 0
MP voted against policy 0% 25 0
MP absent 50% 25 0
Less important votes MP voted with policy 100% 5 12
MP voted against policy 0% 5 0
MP absent 50% 1 1

The final agreement score is a weighted average (weighted arithmetic mean) of the scores of the individual votes.

Average agreement score = sum(n×w×s) / sum(n×w) = 60.5 / 61 = 99%.

And then this average agreement score