How Arthur Sinodinos voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should protect threatened forest and bushland habitats from logging.

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting threatened forest and bushland habitats” which Arthur Sinodinos could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Arthur Sinodinos on this policy.

Division Arthur Sinodinos Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting threatened forest and bushland habitats” which Arthur Sinodinos could have attended.

Division Arthur Sinodinos Supporters vote

10th Sep 2019, 4:23 PM – Senate Motions - Endangered Species - Protect

absent Yes

6th Dec 2018, 12:42 PM – Senate Motions - Halls Island - Make full assessment on World Heritage values

absent Yes

4th Dec 2018, 4:50 PM – Senate Motions - United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity - Heed recommendations

absent Yes

14th Feb 2018, 4:22 PM – Senate Motions - Tasmania: Environment - Tarkine

absent Yes

25th Jun 2013, 3:59 PM – Senate Motions - Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area - Prohibit logging

No Yes

20th Jun 2013, 12:11 PM – Senate Motions - National Parks - Protect

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Arthur Sinodinos has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.