How Larissa Waters voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce an emissions reduction fund so it can buy domestic greenhouse gas emissions reductions and offsets by reverse auction. This is a key part of the Coalition Government's Direct Action policy.

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for an emissions reduction fund” which Larissa Waters could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Larissa Waters on this policy.

Division Larissa Waters Supporters vote

30th Oct 2014, 9:04 PM – Senate Carbon Farming Initiative Amendment Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for an emissions reduction fund” which Larissa Waters could have attended.

Division Larissa Waters Supporters vote

30th Oct 2014, 9:01 PM – Senate Carbon Farming Initiative Amendment Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Criticise the Direct Action policy

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Larissa Waters was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.