How Amanda Vanstone voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should support the exportation of uranium from Australia

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for uranium export” which Amanda Vanstone could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Amanda Vanstone on this policy.

Division Amanda Vanstone Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for uranium export” which Amanda Vanstone could have attended.

Division Amanda Vanstone Supporters vote

27th Feb 2007, 4:04 PM – Senate Motions - Nuclear Proliferation - Block US-India deal at NSG meeting and rule out supply of uranium to India

absent No

27th Feb 2007, 3:43 PM – Senate Motions — Nuclear Weapons — No exporting to non—NPT parties, support support non—proliferation

absent No

10th Oct 2006, 3:42 PM – Senate Motions — Nuclear Nonproliferation — Against Australia becoming a nuclear fuel supply centre and against sale of uranium to India

absent No

14th Sep 2006, 9:59 AM – Senate Motions — Nuclear Tests at Maralinga — For non—proliferation and against export to non—Treaty states

absent No

10th May 2006, 3:56 PM – Senate Motions - Uranium Exports - Oppose export to China

absent No

28th Mar 2006, 3:58 PM – Senate Motions - Uranium Exports - No export to India

No No

28th Feb 2006, 3:46 PM – Senate Motions - Nuclear Non—Proliferation Treaty - Against uranium export to non-Treaty states

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Amanda Vanstone has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.