We can't say anything concrete about how Nick Sherry voted on increasing funding for university education
How Nick Sherry voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase funding for university education
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for university education” which Nick Sherry could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nick Sherry on this policy.
| Division | Nick Sherry | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for university education” which Nick Sherry could have attended.
| Division | Nick Sherry | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
28th Feb 2012, 3:45 PM – Senate Motions - Higher Education - Increase base funding |
absent | Yes |
23rd Nov 2011 – Senate Motions - Education Funding - Increase public higher education funding |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Nick Sherry was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.