How Fiona Nash voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should deregulate Australia's wheat export market so that bulk wheat export is no longer done through a single exporter (which is known as a 'single desk' policy)

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing competition in bulk wheat export” which Fiona Nash could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Fiona Nash on this policy.

Division Fiona Nash Supporters vote

19th Jun 2008, 8:46 PM – Senate Wheat Export Marketing Bill 2008 and Wheat Export Marketing (Repeal and Consequential Amendments) Bill 2008 - Third Reading - Read a third time

absent Yes

17th Jun 2008, 12:41 PM – Senate Wheat Export Marketing Bill 2008 and Wheat Export Marketing (Repeal and Consequential Amendments) Bill 2008 — Second Reading — Read a second time

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing competition in bulk wheat export” which Fiona Nash could have attended.

Division Fiona Nash Supporters vote
no votes listed

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Fiona Nash was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.