We can't say anything concrete about how Chris Evans voted on a publicly accessible foreign ownership register for agricultural land
How Chris Evans voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase transparency by creating a Foreign Ownership Register for Agricultural Land that is available for all citizens to access
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a publicly accessible foreign ownership register for agricultural land” which Chris Evans could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Chris Evans on this policy.
| Division | Chris Evans | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a publicly accessible foreign ownership register for agricultural land” which Chris Evans could have attended.
| Division | Chris Evans | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
11th Sep 2012, 3:45 PM – Senate Motions - Cubbie Station - Foreign investment |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Chris Evans was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.