How Alan Eggleston voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should allow live animal export and place minimal restrictions on it

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for live animal export” which Alan Eggleston could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Alan Eggleston on this policy.

Division Alan Eggleston Supporters vote

19th Jun 2014 – Senate Regulations and Determinations — Australian Meat and Live—stock Industry (Export of Live—stock to Egypt) Repeal Order 2014 — Disallow motion

absent No

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for live animal export” which Alan Eggleston could have attended.

Division Alan Eggleston Supporters vote

12th Dec 2013, 12:32 PM – Senate Motions - Live Animal Exports - Stop export until investigations completed

absent No

15th May 2013, 3:53 PM – Senate Motions - Live Animal Exports - Establish Office of Animal Welfare

absent No

13th Mar 2012 – Senate Motions - Live Animal Exports - Against live animal export

absent No

7th Jul 2011 – Senate Motions - Live Animal Exports - End live animal export

absent No

15th Jun 2011 – Senate Motions — Live Animal Exports — Move to re—establish live export with Indonesia

Yes Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Alan Eggleston has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.