How Stephen Conroy voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should protect Australia's logging industry and the jobs it represents

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Australia's timber industry” which Stephen Conroy could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Stephen Conroy on this policy.

Division Stephen Conroy Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Australia's timber industry” which Stephen Conroy could have attended.

Division Stephen Conroy Supporters vote

17th Aug 2015 – Senate Motions - Tasmania: Timber Industry - Support

No Yes

25th Jun 2013, 3:59 PM – Senate Motions - Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area - Prohibit logging

absent No

20th Jun 2013, 12:11 PM – Senate Motions - National Parks - Protect

absent No

11th May 2010, 4:22 PM – Senate Motions - Environment: Millewa Forest - Stop logging

absent No

29th Nov 2006, 3:45 PM – Senate Motions - Logging in Tasmania’s Weld River Valley - Halt logging

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Stephen Conroy has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.