How Ron Boswell voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should, in relation to agricultural and veterinary ('agvet') chemicals, implement a mandatory scheme for the re-approval of active constituents and re-registration of chemical products to ensure their ongoing safety

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for re-approving/ re-registering agvet chemicals” which Ron Boswell could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ron Boswell on this policy.

Division Ron Boswell Supporters vote

28th Jun 2013, 11:08 AM – Senate Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Legislation Amendment Bill 2013 - Third Reading - Read a third time

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for re-approving/ re-registering agvet chemicals” which Ron Boswell could have attended.

Division Ron Boswell Supporters vote

25th Jun 2014, 12:32 PM – Senate Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Legislation Amendment (Removing Re-approval and Re-registration) Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Read a second time

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Ron Boswell was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.