All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
senate vote 2022-11-23#3
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2022-12-30 11:57:48
|
Title
Documents — Department of the Treasury; Order for the Production of Documents- Documents - Department of the Treasury - Order for the Production of Documents; Crypto asset secondary service providers
Description
<p class="speaker">Wendy Askew</p><p>At the request of Senator Bragg, I move:</p>-
- The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2022-11-23.126.1) introduced by Tasmanian Senator [Wendy Askew](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/tasmania/wendy_askew) (Liberal) on behalf of NSW Senator [Andrew Bragg](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/nsw/andrew_bragg) (Liberal), which means it was successful.
- ### Motion text
- > *That there be laid on the table by the Minister representing the Assistant Treasurer, by no later than 5 pm on Tuesday 29 November 2022, the following documents in relation to the consultation on 'Crypto asset secondary service providers: Licensing and custody requirements', commenced by the Treasury on 21 March 2022:*
- >
- > *(a) all briefings provided to the Assistant Treasurer by the Treasury relating to the Treasury consultation, received between 21 May and 29 November 2022;*
- >
- > *(b) all documents detailing any policy options that have been recommended to the Assistant Treasurer by the Treasury relating to the Treasury consultation, received between 21 May and 29 November 2022;*
- >
- > *(c) any draft legislation that has been developed by the Treasury to implement the policy recommendations specified in paragraph (b), between 21 May and 29 November 2022;*
- >
- > *(d) all documents and/or correspondence between the Assistant Treasurer and the Treasury detailing a determination on why submissions to the Treasury consultation have not been uploaded to the Treasury website received between 21 May and 29 November 2022;*
- >
- > *(e) all submissions provided to the Treasury consultation; and*
- >
- > *(f) all documents, briefings and/or correspondence detailing meetings between the Assistant Treasurer and the Treasury regarding this Treasury consultation, between 21 May and 29 November 2022.*
<p class="italic">That there be laid on the table by the Minister representing the Assistant Treasurer, by no later than 5 pm on Tuesday 29 November 2022, the following documents in relation to the consultation on 'Crypto asset secondary service providers: Licensing and custody requirements', commenced by the Treasury on 21 March 2022:</p><p class="italic">(a) all briefings provided to the Assistant Treasurer by the Treasury relating to the Treasury consultation, received between 21 May and 29 November 2022;</p><p class="italic">(b) all documents detailing any policy options that have been recommended to the Assistant Treasurer by the Treasury relating to the Treasury consultation, received between 21 May and 29 November 2022;</p><p class="italic">(c) any draft legislation that has been developed by the Treasury to implement the policy recommendations specified in paragraph (b), between 21 May and 29 November 2022;</p><p class="italic">(d) all documents and/or correspondence between the Assistant Treasurer and the Treasury detailing a determination on why submissions to the Treasury consultation have not been uploaded to the Treasury website received between 21 May and 29 November 2022;</p><p class="italic">(e) all submissions provided to the Treasury consultation; and</p><p class="italic">(f) all documents, briefings and/or correspondence detailing meetings between the Assistant Treasurer and the Treasury regarding this Treasury consultation, between 21 May and 29 November 2022.</p> <p class="speaker">Anthony Chisholm</p><p>I seek leave to make a short statement.</p> <p class="speaker">Sue Lines</p><p>Leave is granted for one minute.</p> <p class="speaker">Anthony Chisholm</p><p>Senator Bragg's motion, as usual, is a waste of time. He has already asked the Assistant Treasurer for the exact same documents through a freedom of information process and has submitted the request through a parliamentary question on notice. Senator Bragg is good at wasting the Senate's time, and, again, this is another stunt. It is not a duplication process but a triplication. The government is more than happy to be transparent on this issue through the FOI and the question on notice process. The motion is a waste of time and should be opposed.</p> <p class="speaker">Sue Lines</p><p>The question is that general business notice of motion No. 86 standing in the name of Senator Bragg and moved by Senator Askew be agreed to.</p><p></p><p></p> -
-
|