All changes made to the description and title of this division.

View division | Edit description

Change Division
representatives vote 2013-05-15#2

Edited by system

on 2014-10-07 16:19:29

Title

Description

  • The majority voted against [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-05-15.42.1 amendments] introduced by Nationals MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=John_Cobb&mpc=Calare&house=representatives John Cobb], which means that they were rejected.
  • In his explanation of the amendments, Mr Cobb said that the Coalition "is strongly of the view that the only way to achieve the stated aim of the bill to increase efficiency and speed up the review of high-risk chemistries is to remove the reregistration process."(Read Mr Cobb's full explanation of his amendments [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-05-15.42.1 here]. )
  • ''Background to the bill''
  • The [http://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary_business/bills_legislation/bills_search_results/result?bid=r4941 bill] was introduced to implement one of the Government's [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_federal_election,_2010 2010 election] promises. This promise was made in response to recommendations of the Australian National Audit Office and the Productivity Commission.(Read more about the background to the bill in its [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1213a/13bd089 bills digest]. )
  • It amends the [http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/aavcca1994382/sch1.html Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code] (the Agvet Code) which is a Schedule to the [http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/aavcca1994382/ Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code Act 1994] to:
  • * through a risk-based approach, improve: the consistency and transparency of the process for making, and assessing, applications for approval of an [http://www.apvma.gov.au/products/constituents/ active constituent] for a proposed, or existing, chemical product; and the registration of a chemical product and approval of a label for the containers of a chemical product
  • * insert a new requirement that existing approvals and registrations operate for a finite period and, when that period has elapsed, a new application must be lodged for re-approval or re-registration and
  • *update existing offences, create new offences and insert [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_penalty civil penalty] provisions.(Read more about the background to the bill in its [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1213a/13bd089 bills digest]. )
  • The majority voted against [amendments](http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-05-15.42.1) introduced by Nationals MP [John Cobb](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=John_Cobb&mpc=Calare&house=representatives), which means that they were rejected.
  • In his explanation of the amendments, Mr Cobb said that the Coalition "is strongly of the view that the only way to achieve the stated aim of the bill to increase efficiency and speed up the review of high-risk chemistries is to remove the reregistration process."(Read Mr Cobb's full explanation of his amendments [here](http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-05-15.42.1). )
  • _Background to the bill_
  • The [bill](http://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary_business/bills_legislation/bills_search_results/result?bid=r4941) was introduced to implement one of the Government's [2010 election](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_federal_election,_2010) promises. This promise was made in response to recommendations of the Australian National Audit Office and the Productivity Commission.(Read more about the background to the bill in its [bills digest](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1213a/13bd089). )
  • It amends the [Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code](http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/aavcca1994382/sch1.html) (the Agvet Code) which is a Schedule to the [Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code Act 1994](http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/aavcca1994382/) to:
  • - through a risk-based approach, improve: the consistency and transparency of the process for making, and assessing, applications for approval of an [active constituent](http://www.apvma.gov.au/products/constituents/) for a proposed, or existing, chemical product; and the registration of a chemical product and approval of a label for the containers of a chemical product
  • - insert a new requirement that existing approvals and registrations operate for a finite period and, when that period has elapsed, a new application must be lodged for re-approval or re-registration and
  • - update existing offences, create new offences and insert [civil penalty](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_penalty) provisions.(Read more about the background to the bill in its [bills digest](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1213a/13bd089).
  • )
representatives vote 2013-05-15#2

Edited by system

on 2014-10-07 16:16:23

Title

Description

  • The majority voted against [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-05-15.42.1 amendments] introduced by Nationals MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=John_Cobb&mpc=Calare&house=representatives John Cobb], which means that they were rejected.
  • In his explanation of the amendments, Mr Cobb said that the Coalition "is strongly of the view that the only way to achieve the stated aim of the bill to increase efficiency and speed up the review of high-risk chemistries is to remove the reregistration process."[1]
  • In his explanation of the amendments, Mr Cobb said that the Coalition "is strongly of the view that the only way to achieve the stated aim of the bill to increase efficiency and speed up the review of high-risk chemistries is to remove the reregistration process."(Read Mr Cobb's full explanation of his amendments [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-05-15.42.1 here]. )
  • ''Background to the bill''
  • The [http://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary_business/bills_legislation/bills_search_results/result?bid=r4941 bill] was introduced to implement one of the Government's [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_federal_election,_2010 2010 election] promises. This promise was made in response to recommendations of the Australian National Audit Office and the Productivity Commission.[2]
  • The [http://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary_business/bills_legislation/bills_search_results/result?bid=r4941 bill] was introduced to implement one of the Government's [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_federal_election,_2010 2010 election] promises. This promise was made in response to recommendations of the Australian National Audit Office and the Productivity Commission.(Read more about the background to the bill in its [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1213a/13bd089 bills digest]. )
  • It amends the [http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/aavcca1994382/sch1.html Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code] (the Agvet Code) which is a Schedule to the [http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/aavcca1994382/ Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code Act 1994] to:
  • * through a risk-based approach, improve: the consistency and transparency of the process for making, and assessing, applications for approval of an [http://www.apvma.gov.au/products/constituents/ active constituent] for a proposed, or existing, chemical product; and the registration of a chemical product and approval of a label for the containers of a chemical product
  • * insert a new requirement that existing approvals and registrations operate for a finite period and, when that period has elapsed, a new application must be lodged for re-approval or re-registration and
  • *update existing offences, create new offences and insert [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_penalty civil penalty] provisions.[2]
  • *update existing offences, create new offences and insert [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_penalty civil penalty] provisions.(Read more about the background to the bill in its [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1213a/13bd089 bills digest]. )
  • ''References''
  • * [1] Read Mr Cobb's full explanation of his amendments [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-05-15.42.1 here].
  • * [2] Read more about the background to the bill in its [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1213a/13bd089 bills digest].
  • * [3] Read more about these changes and the other measures introduced by the bill in its [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1213a/13bd089 bills digest].
representatives vote 2013-05-15#2

Edited by mackay

on 2014-06-26 13:35:11

Title

Description

  • The majority voted against [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-05-15.42.1 amendments] introduced by Nationals MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=John_Cobb&mpc=Calare&house=representatives John Cobb], which means that they were rejected.
  • In his explanation of the amendments, Mr Cobb said that the Coalition "is strongly of the view that the only way to achieve the stated aim of the bill to increase efficiency and speed up the review of high-risk chemistries is to remove the reregistration process."[1]
  • ''Background to the bill''
  • The [http://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary_business/bills_legislation/bills_search_results/result?bid=r4941 bill] was introduced to implement one of the Government's [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_federal_election,_2010 2010 election] promises. This promise was made in response to recommendations of the Australian National Audit Office and the Productivity Commission.[2]
  • It amends the [http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/aavcca1994382/sch1.html Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code] (the Agvet Code) which is a Schedule to the [http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/aavcca1994382/ Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code Act 1994] to:
  • * through a risk-based approach, improve: the consistency and transparency of the process for making, and assessing, applications for approval of an [http://www.apvma.gov.au/products/constituents/ active constituent] for a proposed, or existing, chemical product; and the registration of a chemical product and approval of a label for the containers of a chemical product
  • * insert a new requirement that existing approvals and registrations operate for a finite period and, when that period has elapsed, a new application must be lodged for re-approval or re-registration and
  • *update existing offences, create new offences and insert [civil penalty civil penalty] provisions.[2]
  • *update existing offences, create new offences and insert [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_penalty civil penalty] provisions.[2]
  • ''References''
  • * [1] Read Mr Cobb's full explanation of his amendments [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-05-15.42.1 here].
  • * [2] Read more about the background to the bill in its [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1213a/13bd089 bills digest].
  • * [3] Read more about these changes and the other measures introduced by the bill in its [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1213a/13bd089 bills digest].
  • * [3] Read more about these changes and the other measures introduced by the bill in its [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1213a/13bd089 bills digest].
representatives vote 2013-05-15#2

Edited by mackay

on 2014-06-26 13:33:56

Title

  • Bills — Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Legislation Amendment Bill 2012; Consideration in Detail
  • Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Legislation Amendment Bill 2012 - Consideration in Detail - Remove re-registration process

Description

  • <p class='motion-notice motion-notice-truncated'>Long debate text truncated.</p>
  • The majority voted against [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-05-15.42.1 amendments] introduced by Nationals MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=John_Cobb&mpc=Calare&house=representatives John Cobb], which means that they were rejected.
  • In his explanation of the amendments, Mr Cobb said that the Coalition "is strongly of the view that the only way to achieve the stated aim of the bill to increase efficiency and speed up the review of high-risk chemistries is to remove the reregistration process."[1]
  • ''Background to the bill''
  • The [http://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary_business/bills_legislation/bills_search_results/result?bid=r4941 bill] was introduced to implement one of the Government's [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_federal_election,_2010 2010 election] promises. This promise was made in response to recommendations of the Australian National Audit Office and the Productivity Commission.[2]
  • It amends the [http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/aavcca1994382/sch1.html Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code] (the Agvet Code) which is a Schedule to the [http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/aavcca1994382/ Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code Act 1994] to:
  • * through a risk-based approach, improve: the consistency and transparency of the process for making, and assessing, applications for approval of an [http://www.apvma.gov.au/products/constituents/ active constituent] for a proposed, or existing, chemical product; and the registration of a chemical product and approval of a label for the containers of a chemical product
  • * insert a new requirement that existing approvals and registrations operate for a finite period and, when that period has elapsed, a new application must be lodged for re-approval or re-registration and
  • *update existing offences, create new offences and insert [civil penalty civil penalty] provisions.[2]
  • ''References''
  • * [1] Read Mr Cobb's full explanation of his amendments [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2013-05-15.42.1 here].
  • * [2] Read more about the background to the bill in its [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1213a/13bd089 bills digest].
  • * [3] Read more about these changes and the other measures introduced by the bill in its [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1213a/13bd089 bills digest].